Arthritis Insight Homepage
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Death Rates Among Patients From Common RA Drugs

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
levlarry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 December 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3492
  Quote levlarry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Death Rates Among Patients From Common RA Drugs
    Posted: 09 August 2012 at 4:51am

No Difference in Death Rates Among Patients Exposed to Common Rheumatoid Arthritis Drugs, Study Suggests

ScienceDaily (Aug. 2, 2012) — New research confirms no significant difference in the rates of death among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were exposed to one of several TNF inhibitors used to treat RA, adalimumab (Humira), etanercept (Enbrel), and infliximab (Remicade). This population-based study of RA patients in Sweden -- the first to compare mortality rates among patients treated with individual TNF inhibitors -- is now available in Arthritis & Rheumatism.

RA is a chronic, autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation in the joints that causes pain, tenderness and swelling. The World Health Organization estimates that RA affects up to one percent of individuals worldwide, with more than one million Americans diagnosed with the disease according to the ACR. Rheumatologists recommend early intervention with biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) such as TNF inhibitors to slow disease progression, improve function, and prevent disability.

In Sweden nearly 15% of RA patients are prescribed TNF inhibitors. The present study examined the mortality rates in RA patients exposed to adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab. "Understanding risk versus benefits of treatment with the most commonly prescribed biologics is important for physicians and patients in managing RA," said lead author Dr. Julia Fridman Simard with the Clinical Epidemiology Unit at Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden.

Researchers linked data from the Swedish Biologics Register (ARTIS), a comprehensive database of patients initiating first-ever biologic therapy for rheumatic diseases, and information from national Swedish registers that included data such as all-cause mortality, demographics, and RA characteristics. Between 2003 and 2008, 1,609 patients with RA initiated treatment with adalimumab, 2,686 with etanercept, and 2,027 with infliximab as their first ever biologic DMARD.

There were more than 19,000 person-years of follow-up during the five-year study period during which time 211 patients died (3.3%). "While we found no statistically significant difference in mortality rates across the three biologic therapies, further studies are needed to determine if this is true across certain subsets of patients with RA," concludes Dr. Simard.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
It always feels so good to just feel better.
On that jingle jangle morning I'll come fly with you.
Back to Top
Brisen View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 June 2007
Location: So. California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3712
  Quote Brisen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 August 2012 at 1:57pm
Well that's certainly good to know!
Gale





Back to Top
6t5frlane View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 August 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1844
  Quote 6t5frlane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 August 2012 at 5:14pm
Originally posted by Brisen

Well that's certainly good to know!
 
Unless your one of the 211 that died taking them. I would bet they would prefer to alive with RA then dead 
6t5frlane
Back to Top
levlarry View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 06 December 2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3492
  Quote levlarry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 August 2012 at 4:59am
The way I understood the study was that the 211 is the same amount of deaths as is the normal amount of deaths compared to those not taking the drugs. Probably though, the death rate certainly has to be less from the new drugs or Ra on these drugs than from the earlier years with the older drug treatments and of course, these drugs offer a much better life. There is not much happiness when we are surrounded with pain. Most all of us are well aware of that. Of course, I still believe that the safe cure is just around the corner. We all just have to make sure we are still here to reap the benefits.
 
LEV
 
It always feels so good to just feel better.
On that jingle jangle morning I'll come fly with you.
Back to Top
6t5frlane View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 August 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1844
  Quote 6t5frlane Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 August 2012 at 7:31am
" The Safe Cure "...I sure hope your right Lev. I have been waiting 22 years !!
6t5frlane
Back to Top
milly View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 03 October 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3743
  Quote milly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 August 2012 at 4:09am
 I do not think they implied that the drugs actually killed these people as much as they are saying that they just did not live as long as the others did?  ?
 
 Also I am not sure if they are saying that those on biologics live as long as the average person or if they are saying that they live as long as the average person with RA.
 
 Reason I am wondering is because people with RA are not supposed to live quite as long as the average healthy person. So my question is no difference in death rates for RA patients that take biologics.
 
 To me that just means it probably will not make you die any sooner however no difference is still not the wording of success that I would be hoping to hear either?
 
 I would like someday to hear of something that actually prolongs the life of a person with RA. Still it is nice to know it is not causing a great deal of harm.
 
 I just found this article to be a bit fauge and somewhat confusing. Who were these patients compared to. How long did they actually live on average?
 
 I am not downing biologics but this article is something else. How can you possibly have 19,000 people- years of follow up in a five year period? What? Five years is people years you can not put more than five years into five years.
 
 Also I think they are just saying one biologic seems to be as safe as another.


Edited by milly - 21 August 2012 at 4:22am
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.08
Copyright ©2001-2008 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.